Eritrea vs Senegal: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Eritrea
71.03
in 2014
Senegal
72.09
in 2014
Eritrea rank
133rd
Senegal rank
130th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Eritrea
  • Senegal
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 72.09 against 71.03 in Eritrea, a difference of 1.06.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 133rd and Senegal ranks 130th of 181 countries.

Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Senegal Difference Ahead
2000s 18.33 64.52 46.19 Senegal
2010s 62.43 70.17 7.74 Senegal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Eritrea or Senegal?
Senegal, at 72.09 against 71.03 in Eritrea as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Eritrea and Senegal?
1.06, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Senegal?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Eritrea and Senegal rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Eritrea ranks 133rd and Senegal ranks 130th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.