How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Maldives?

10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Equatorial Guinea vs Maldives: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)

Equatorial Guinea

78.13

in 2014

Maldives

77.95

in 2014

Equatorial Guinea rank

116th

Maldives rank

119th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time

Equatorial Guinea
Maldives

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 78.13 against 77.95 in Maldives, a difference of 0.18.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Maldives ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 116th and Maldives ranks 119th of 183 countries.

Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Equatorial Guinea	Maldives	Difference	Ahead
2000s	57.36	73.65	16.29	Maldives
2010s	71.88	76.58	4.7	Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Equatorial Guinea or Maldives?: Equatorial Guinea, at 78.13 against 77.95 in Maldives as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Equatorial Guinea and Maldives?: 0.18, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Maldives?: 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Maldives rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?: Equatorial Guinea ranks 116th and Maldives ranks 119th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Maldives: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15). Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-db06-15-methodology-score/equatorial-guinea/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-db06-15-methodology-score/equatorial-guinea/maldives/">Equatorial Guinea vs Maldives: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.