Denmark vs Thailand: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Denmark
93.31
in 2014
Thailand
93.05
in 2014
Denmark rank
24th
Thailand rank
27th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Denmark
- Thailand
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 93.31 against 93.05 in Thailand, a difference of 0.26.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 24th and Thailand ranks 27th of 181 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.94 | 86.88 | 6.06 | Denmark |
| 2010s | 92.82 | 92.35 | 0.4708 | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Denmark or Thailand?
- Denmark, at 93.31 against 93.05 in Thailand as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Denmark and Thailand?
- 0.26, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Thailand?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Denmark and Thailand rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Denmark ranks 24th and Thailand ranks 27th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.