Denmark vs Sweden: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Denmark
93.31
in 2014
Sweden
93.49
in 2014
Denmark rank
24th
Sweden rank
23rd

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Denmark
  • Sweden
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 93.49 against 93.31 in Denmark, a difference of 0.18.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 24th and Sweden ranks 23rd of 181 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 92.94 93.36 0.4199 Sweden
2010s 92.82 93.23 0.4032 Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Denmark or Sweden?
Sweden, at 93.49 against 93.31 in Denmark as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Denmark and Sweden?
0.18, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Sweden?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Denmark and Sweden rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Denmark ranks 24th and Sweden ranks 23rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.