Denmark vs Fiji: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Denmark
93.31
in 2014
Fiji
93.17
in 2014
Denmark rank
24th
Fiji rank
26th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Denmark
  • Fiji
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 93.31 against 93.17 in Fiji, a difference of 0.14.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 24th and Fiji ranks 26th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Fiji in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Fiji Difference Ahead
2000s 92.94 92.86 0.0855 Denmark
2010s 92.82 93.59 0.7631 Fiji

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Denmark or Fiji?
Denmark, at 93.31 against 93.17 in Fiji as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Denmark and Fiji?
0.14, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Fiji?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Denmark and Fiji rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Denmark ranks 24th and Fiji ranks 26th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.