Czech Republic vs Togo: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Czech Republic
84.97
in 2014
Togo
85.41
in 2014
Czech Republic rank
71st
Togo rank
68th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Czech Republic
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 85.41 against 84.97 in Czech Republic, a difference of 0.44.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Czech Republic ahead.
Czech Republic ranks 71st and Togo ranks 68th of 183 countries.
Czech Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czech Republic | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.21 | 81.42 | 6.79 | Czech Republic |
| 2010s | 85.15 | 84.29 | 0.8591 | Czech Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Czech Republic or Togo?
- Togo, at 85.41 against 84.97 in Czech Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Czech Republic and Togo?
- 0.44, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czech Republic and Togo?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Czech Republic and Togo rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Czech Republic ranks 71st and Togo ranks 68th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.