Czechia vs Jordan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Czechia
84.97
in 2014
Jordan
84.61
in 2014
Czechia rank
71st
Jordan rank
74th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Czechia
- Jordan
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 84.97 against 84.61 in Jordan, a difference of 0.36.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 71st and Jordan ranks 74th of 183 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.21 | 73.91 | 14.3 | Czechia |
| 2010s | 85.15 | 80.69 | 4.46 | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Czechia or Jordan?
- Czechia, at 84.97 against 84.61 in Jordan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Czechia and Jordan?
- 0.36, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Jordan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Czechia and Jordan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Czechia ranks 71st and Jordan ranks 74th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.