Cyprus vs Netherlands: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Cyprus
88.61
in 2014
Netherlands
89.23
in 2014
Cyprus rank
50th
Netherlands rank
47th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Cyprus
- Netherlands
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 89.23 against 88.61 in Cyprus, a difference of 0.62.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 50th and Netherlands ranks 47th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.4 | 88.08 | 0.3234 | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 88.66 | 88.91 | 0.2546 | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Cyprus or Netherlands?
- Netherlands, at 89.23 against 88.61 in Cyprus as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Cyprus and Netherlands?
- 0.62, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Netherlands?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
- How do Cyprus and Netherlands rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Cyprus ranks 50th and Netherlands ranks 47th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.