Cyprus vs Japan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Cyprus
88.61
in 2014
Japan
88.41
in 2014
Cyprus rank
51st
Japan rank
53rd
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Cyprus
- Japan
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 88.61 against 88.41 in Japan, a difference of 0.2.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Japan ahead.
Cyprus ranks 51st and Japan ranks 53rd of 184 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.4 | 88.37 | 0.031 | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 88.66 | 87.91 | 0.7443 | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Cyprus or Japan?
- Cyprus, at 88.61 against 88.41 in Japan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Cyprus and Japan?
- 0.2, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Japan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
- How do Cyprus and Japan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Cyprus ranks 51st and Japan ranks 53rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.