Croatia vs Suriname: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Croatia
85.5
in 2014
Suriname
85.41
in 2014
Croatia rank
67th
Suriname rank
68th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Croatia
- Suriname
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 85.5 against 85.41 in Suriname, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 67th and Suriname ranks 68th of 183 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.66 | 75.79 | 5.88 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 85.11 | 84.22 | 0.8887 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Croatia or Suriname?
- Croatia, at 85.5 against 85.41 in Suriname as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Croatia and Suriname?
- 0.09, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Suriname?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Croatia and Suriname rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Croatia ranks 67th and Suriname ranks 68th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.