Côte d'Ivoire vs Senegal: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Côte d'Ivoire
71.74
in 2014
Senegal
72.09
in 2014
Côte d'Ivoire rank
134th
Senegal rank
132nd
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 72.09 against 71.74 in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.35.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 134th and Senegal ranks 132nd of 183 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.74 | 64.52 | 8.78 | Senegal |
| 2010s | 61.74 | 70.17 | 8.43 | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Côte d'Ivoire or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 72.09 against 71.74 in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Côte d'Ivoire and Senegal?
- 0.35, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Senegal?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Senegal rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 134th and Senegal ranks 132nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.