Côte d'Ivoire vs Eritrea: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Côte d'Ivoire
71.74
in 2014
Eritrea
71.03
in 2014
Côte d'Ivoire rank
134th
Eritrea rank
135th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Eritrea
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 71.74 against 71.03 in Eritrea, a difference of 0.71.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 134th and Eritrea ranks 135th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.74 | 18.33 | 37.41 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 61.74 | 62.43 | 0.6904 | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Côte d'Ivoire or Eritrea?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 71.74 against 71.03 in Eritrea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Côte d'Ivoire and Eritrea?
- 0.71, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Eritrea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Eritrea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 134th and Eritrea ranks 135th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.