Colombia vs Syrian Arab Republic: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Colombia
62.68
in 2014
Syrian Arab Republic
63.75
in 2014
Colombia rank
154th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
152nd
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Colombia
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 63.75 against 62.68 in Colombia, a difference of 1.07.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 154th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 152nd of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Syrian Arab Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.92 | 65.53 | 0.3904 | Colombia |
| 2010s | 61.35 | 72.89 | 11.55 | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Colombia or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 63.75 against 62.68 in Colombia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Colombia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 1.07, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Colombia and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Colombia ranks 154th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 152nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.