Colombia vs Russian Federation: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Colombia
62.68
in 2014
Russian Federation
60.47
in 2014
Colombia rank
154th
Russian Federation rank
155th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Colombia
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 62.68 against 60.47 in Russian Federation, a difference of 2.21.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Colombia has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 154th and Russian Federation ranks 155th of 183 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.92 | 37.28 | 28.65 | Colombia |
| 2010s | 61.35 | 51.46 | 9.89 | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Colombia or Russian Federation?
- Colombia, at 62.68 against 60.47 in Russian Federation as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Colombia and Russian Federation?
- 2.21, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Russian Federation?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Colombia and Russian Federation rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Colombia ranks 154th and Russian Federation ranks 155th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.