Colombia vs Nepal: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Colombia
62.68
in 2014
Nepal
59.49
in 2014
Colombia rank
152nd
Nepal rank
155th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Colombia
- Nepal
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 62.68 against 59.49 in Nepal, a difference of 3.19.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 152nd and Nepal ranks 155th of 181 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.92 | 45.99 | 19.93 | Colombia |
| 2010s | 61.35 | 59.48 | 1.87 | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Colombia or Nepal?
- Colombia, at 62.68 against 59.49 in Nepal as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Colombia and Nepal?
- 3.19, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Nepal?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Colombia and Nepal rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Colombia ranks 152nd and Nepal ranks 155th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.