China vs Estonia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
China
92.34
in 2014
Estonia
92.42
in 2014
China rank
32nd
Estonia rank
31st
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- China
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 92.42 against 92.34 in China, a difference of 0.08.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was China ahead.
China ranks 32nd and Estonia ranks 31st of 184 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.23 | 90.22 | 5.01 | China |
| 2010s | 94.07 | 91.93 | 2.14 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), China or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 92.42 against 92.34 in China as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between China and Estonia?
- 0.08, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Estonia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do China and Estonia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- China ranks 32nd and Estonia ranks 31st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.