Chile vs Tunisia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Chile
91.27
in 2014
Tunisia
90.38
in 2014
Chile rank
38th
Tunisia rank
40th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Chile
- Tunisia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 91.27 against 90.38 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.89.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tunisia ahead.
Chile ranks 38th and Tunisia ranks 40th of 181 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.43 | 89.29 | 2.15 | Chile |
| 2010s | 90.95 | 89.66 | 1.29 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Chile or Tunisia?
- Chile, at 91.27 against 90.38 in Tunisia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Chile and Tunisia?
- 0.89, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tunisia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Chile and Tunisia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Chile ranks 38th and Tunisia ranks 40th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.