Chile vs New Zealand: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Chile
91.27
in 2014
New Zealand
91.89
in 2014
Chile rank
38th
New Zealand rank
35th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Chile
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 91.89 against 91.27 in Chile, a difference of 0.62.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 38th and New Zealand ranks 35th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.43 | 89.62 | 1.81 | Chile |
| 2010s | 90.95 | 91.51 | 0.5666 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Chile or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 91.89 against 91.27 in Chile as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Chile and New Zealand?
- 0.62, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Chile ranks 38th and New Zealand ranks 35th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.