Chad vs Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Chad
0
in 2014
Zimbabwe
0
in 2014
Chad rank
174th
Zimbabwe rank
174th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Chad
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0 against 0 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 174th and Zimbabwe ranks 174th of 181 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 23.21 | 23.21 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0 | 7.84 | 7.84 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Chad or Zimbabwe?
- Chad, at 0 against 0 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Chad and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Zimbabwe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Chad and Zimbabwe rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Chad ranks 174th and Zimbabwe ranks 174th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.