Canada vs Namibia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Canada
76.71
in 2014
Namibia
74.49
in 2014
Canada rank
122nd
Namibia rank
125th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Canada
  • Namibia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Canada currently reports 76.71 against 74.49 in Namibia, a difference of 2.22.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 125th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 75.33 74.87 0.4624 Canada
2010s 76.19 79.01 2.83 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Canada or Namibia?
Canada, at 76.71 against 74.49 in Namibia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Canada and Namibia?
2.22, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Namibia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Canada and Namibia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Canada ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 125th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.