Canada vs Namibia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Canada
76.71
in 2014
Namibia
74.49
in 2014
Canada rank
122nd
Namibia rank
125th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Canada
- Namibia
How they compare
Canada currently reports 76.71 against 74.49 in Namibia, a difference of 2.22.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 125th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.33 | 74.87 | 0.4624 | Canada |
| 2010s | 76.19 | 79.01 | 2.83 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Canada or Namibia?
- Canada, at 76.71 against 74.49 in Namibia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Canada and Namibia?
- 2.22, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Namibia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Canada and Namibia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Canada ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 125th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.