Cameroon vs Eswatini: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Cameroon
66.29
in 2014
Eswatini
66.68
in 2014
Cameroon rank
142nd
Eswatini rank
140th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Cameroon
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 66.68 against 66.29 in Cameroon, a difference of 0.39.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cameroon ahead.
Cameroon ranks 142nd and Eswatini ranks 140th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.73 | 47.98 | 13.75 | Cameroon |
| 2010s | 62.71 | 63.03 | 0.3156 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Cameroon or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 66.68 against 66.29 in Cameroon as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Cameroon and Eswatini?
- 0.39, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Eswatini?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Cameroon and Eswatini rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Cameroon ranks 142nd and Eswatini ranks 140th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.