Cape Verde vs Morocco: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Cape Verde
90.12
in 2014
Morocco
89.32
in 2014
Cape Verde rank
43rd
Morocco rank
46th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Cape Verde
- Morocco
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 90.12 against 89.32 in Morocco, a difference of 0.8.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 43rd and Morocco ranks 46th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.22 | 83.17 | 4.05 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 88.73 | 88.97 | 0.2456 | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Cape Verde or Morocco?
- Cape Verde, at 90.12 against 89.32 in Morocco as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Cape Verde and Morocco?
- 0.8, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Morocco?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Cape Verde and Morocco rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Cape Verde ranks 43rd and Morocco ranks 46th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.