Burundi vs Niger: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Burundi
28.06
in 2014
Niger
26.64
in 2014
Burundi rank
168th
Niger rank
169th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Burundi
  • Niger
010203040200520092014

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 28.06 against 26.64 in Niger, a difference of 1.42.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Niger's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Niger ahead.

Burundi ranks 168th and Niger ranks 169th of 181 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Niger Difference Ahead
2000s 0 34.68 34.68 Niger
2010s 9.11 35.31 26.2 Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Burundi or Niger?
Burundi, at 28.06 against 26.64 in Niger as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Burundi and Niger?
1.42, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Niger?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Burundi and Niger rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Burundi ranks 168th and Niger ranks 169th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.