Burkina Faso vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Burkina Faso
29.65
in 2014
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
30.36
in 2014
Burkina Faso rank
170th
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
169th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Burkina Faso
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
How they compare
Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 30.36 against 29.65 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.71.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 170th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 169th of 184 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.61 | 0 | 21.61 | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 28.86 | 26.6 | 2.27 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Burkina Faso or Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 30.36 against 29.65 in Burkina Faso as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Burkina Faso and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- 0.71, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Burkina Faso and Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Burkina Faso ranks 170th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 169th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.