Burkina Faso vs Burundi: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Burkina Faso
29.65
in 2014
Burundi
28.06
in 2014
Burkina Faso rank
170th
Burundi rank
171st
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Burkina Faso
- Burundi
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 29.65 against 28.06 in Burundi, a difference of 1.59.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 170th and Burundi ranks 171st of 184 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Burundi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.61 | 0 | 21.61 | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 28.86 | 9.11 | 19.75 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Burkina Faso or Burundi?
- Burkina Faso, at 29.65 against 28.06 in Burundi as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Burkina Faso and Burundi?
- 1.59, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Burundi?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Burkina Faso and Burundi rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Burkina Faso ranks 170th and Burundi ranks 171st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.