Brunei Darussalam vs Thailand: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Brunei Darussalam
92.87
in 2014
Thailand
93.05
in 2014
Brunei Darussalam rank
28th
Thailand rank
27th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 93.05 against 92.87 in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.18.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 28th and Thailand ranks 27th of 183 countries.
Brunei Darussalam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.16 | 88.18 | 5.98 | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2010s | 92.41 | 92.35 | 0.0583 | Brunei Darussalam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Brunei Darussalam or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 93.05 against 92.87 in Brunei Darussalam as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Brunei Darussalam and Thailand?
- 0.18, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Thailand?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Thailand rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 28th and Thailand ranks 27th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.