Brunei Darussalam vs Estonia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Brunei Darussalam
92.87
in 2014
Estonia
92.42
in 2014
Brunei Darussalam rank
28th
Estonia rank
31st
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Estonia
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 92.87 against 92.42 in Estonia, a difference of 0.45.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 28th and Estonia ranks 31st of 183 countries.
Brunei Darussalam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.16 | 90.7 | 3.46 | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2010s | 92.41 | 91.93 | 0.4795 | Brunei Darussalam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Brunei Darussalam or Estonia?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 92.87 against 92.42 in Estonia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Brunei Darussalam and Estonia?
- 0.45, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Estonia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Estonia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 28th and Estonia ranks 31st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.