Brazil vs Syrian Arab Republic: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Brazil
65.3
in 2014
Syrian Arab Republic
63.75
in 2014
Brazil rank
149th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
152nd
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Brazil
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 65.3 against 63.75 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 1.55.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 149th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 152nd of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Syrian Arab Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.62 | 65.53 | 8.09 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 63.64 | 72.89 | 9.26 | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Brazil or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Brazil, at 65.3 against 63.75 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Brazil and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 1.55, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Brazil and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Brazil ranks 149th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 152nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.