Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Togo: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
85.23
in 2014
Togo
85.41
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
70th
Togo rank
68th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 85.41 against 85.23 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.18.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Togo ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 70th and Togo ranks 68th of 184 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.1 | 81.42 | 1.68 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 84.51 | 84.29 | 0.2138 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Togo?
- Togo, at 85.41 against 85.23 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Togo?
- 0.18, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Togo?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Togo rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 70th and Togo ranks 68th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.