Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Czechia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
85.23
in 2014
Czechia
84.97
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
70th
Czechia rank
71st
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Czechia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 85.23 against 84.97 in Czechia, a difference of 0.26.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Czechia ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 70th and Czechia ranks 71st of 184 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.1 | 88.21 | 5.11 | Czechia |
| 2010s | 84.51 | 85.15 | 0.6453 | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Czechia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 85.23 against 84.97 in Czechia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Czechia?
- 0.26, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Czechia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Czechia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 70th and Czechia ranks 71st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.