Bhutan vs St. Lucia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Bhutan
65.17
in 2014
St. Lucia
66.06
in 2014
Bhutan rank
150th
St. Lucia rank
147th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Bhutan
- St. Lucia
How they compare
St. Lucia currently reports 66.06 against 65.17 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.89.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 150th and St. Lucia ranks 147th of 183 countries.
St. Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | St. Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.5 | 57.29 | 0.7943 | St. Lucia |
| 2010s | 55.61 | 63.02 | 7.41 | St. Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Bhutan or St. Lucia?
- St. Lucia, at 66.06 against 65.17 in Bhutan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Bhutan and St. Lucia?
- 0.89, with St. Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and St. Lucia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bhutan and St. Lucia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Bhutan ranks 150th and St. Lucia ranks 147th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.