Belize vs Yemen: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Belize
78.49
in 2014
Yemen
78.84
in 2014
Belize rank
113th
Yemen rank
111th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Belize
  • Yemen
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Yemen currently reports 78.84 against 78.49 in Belize, a difference of 0.35.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 113th and Yemen ranks 111th of 181 countries.

Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Yemen Difference Ahead
2000s 73.9 56.12 17.79 Belize
2010s 76.77 75.46 1.31 Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Belize or Yemen?
Yemen, at 78.84 against 78.49 in Belize as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Belize and Yemen?
0.35, with Yemen ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Yemen?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Belize and Yemen rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Belize ranks 113th and Yemen ranks 111th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.