Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Belize
78.49
in 2014
Equatorial Guinea
78.13
in 2014
Belize rank
113th
Equatorial Guinea rank
115th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Belize
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Belize currently reports 78.49 against 78.13 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.36.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 113th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 115th of 181 countries.
Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.9 | 57.36 | 16.54 | Belize |
| 2010s | 76.77 | 71.88 | 4.89 | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Belize or Equatorial Guinea?
- Belize, at 78.49 against 78.13 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.36, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Belize and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Belize ranks 113th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 115th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.