Belarus vs Eswatini: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Belarus
66.32
in 2014
Eswatini
66.68
in 2014
Belarus rank
141st
Eswatini rank
140th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Belarus
  • Eswatini
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 66.68 against 66.32 in Belarus, a difference of 0.36.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 141st and Eswatini ranks 140th of 181 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Eswatini Difference Ahead
2000s 0 47.98 47.98 Eswatini
2010s 29.5 63.03 33.52 Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Belarus or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 66.68 against 66.32 in Belarus as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Belarus and Eswatini?
0.36, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eswatini?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Belarus and Eswatini rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Belarus ranks 141st and Eswatini ranks 140th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.