Bahrain vs Philippines: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Bahrain
91.09
in 2014
Philippines
90.29
in 2014
Bahrain rank
39th
Philippines rank
42nd

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Bahrain
  • Philippines
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Bahrain currently reports 91.09 against 90.29 in Philippines, a difference of 0.8.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Philippines ahead.

Bahrain ranks 39th and Philippines ranks 42nd of 181 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahrain Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 86.77 88.81 2.04 Philippines
2010s 88.27 92.74 4.48 Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Bahrain or Philippines?
Bahrain, at 91.09 against 90.29 in Philippines as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Bahrain and Philippines?
0.8, with Bahrain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Philippines?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Bahrain and Philippines rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Bahrain ranks 39th and Philippines ranks 42nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.