Bahrain vs Kiribati: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Bahrain
91.09
in 2014
Kiribati
90.38
in 2014
Bahrain rank
39th
Kiribati rank
40th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Bahrain
- Kiribati
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 91.09 against 90.38 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.71.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bahrain ahead.
Bahrain ranks 39th and Kiribati ranks 40th of 181 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.77 | 88.25 | 1.48 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 88.27 | 91.22 | 2.96 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Bahrain or Kiribati?
- Bahrain, at 91.09 against 90.38 in Kiribati as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Bahrain and Kiribati?
- 0.71, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Kiribati?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
- How do Bahrain and Kiribati rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Bahrain ranks 39th and Kiribati ranks 40th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.