Azerbaijan vs Uganda: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Azerbaijan
45.28
in 2014
Uganda
46.61
in 2014
Azerbaijan rank
164th
Uganda rank
162nd
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Azerbaijan
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 46.61 against 45.28 in Azerbaijan, a difference of 1.33.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uganda ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 164th and Uganda ranks 162nd of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.38 | 2.35 | 11.03 | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 35.97 | 36.85 | 0.8765 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Azerbaijan or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 46.61 against 45.28 in Azerbaijan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Azerbaijan and Uganda?
- 1.33, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Uganda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Azerbaijan and Uganda rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Azerbaijan ranks 164th and Uganda ranks 162nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.