Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Iraq: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Azerbaijan, Republic of
- Iraq
How they compare
Azerbaijan, Republic of currently reports 45.28 against 41.73 in Iraq, a difference of 3.55.
That makes Azerbaijan, Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Iraq's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iraq ahead.
Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 164th and Iraq ranks 165th of 183 countries.
Azerbaijan, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan, Republic of | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.38 | 5.03 | 8.35 | Azerbaijan, Republic of |
| 2010s | 35.97 | 31.85 | 4.12 | Azerbaijan, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Azerbaijan, Republic of or Iraq?
- Azerbaijan, Republic of, at 45.28 against 41.73 in Iraq as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Azerbaijan, Republic of and Iraq?
- 3.55, with Azerbaijan, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan, Republic of and Iraq?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Azerbaijan, Republic of and Iraq rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 164th and Iraq ranks 165th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.