Austria vs Suriname: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Austria
84.97
in 2014
Suriname
85.41
in 2014
Austria rank
70th
Suriname rank
67th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Austria
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 85.41 against 84.97 in Austria, a difference of 0.44.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 70th and Suriname ranks 67th of 181 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.06 | 75.79 | 10.27 | Austria |
| 2010s | 84.8 | 84.22 | 0.5784 | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Austria or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 85.41 against 84.97 in Austria as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Austria and Suriname?
- 0.44, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Suriname?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Austria and Suriname rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Austria ranks 70th and Suriname ranks 67th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.