Australia vs Czechia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Australia
84.88
in 2014
Czechia
84.97
in 2014
Australia rank
72nd
Czechia rank
70th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Australia
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 84.97 against 84.88 in Australia, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Czechia ahead.
Australia ranks 72nd and Czechia ranks 70th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Czechia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.67 | 88.21 | 6.54 | Czechia |
| 2010s | 85.79 | 85.15 | 0.6343 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Australia or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 84.97 against 84.88 in Australia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Australia and Czechia?
- 0.09, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Czechia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Czechia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Australia ranks 72nd and Czechia ranks 70th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.