Armenia vs South Africa: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Armenia
67.92
in 2014
South Africa
69.61
in 2014
Armenia rank
141st
South Africa rank
139th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Armenia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 69.61 against 67.92 in Armenia, a difference of 1.69.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was South Africa ahead.
Armenia ranks 141st and South Africa ranks 139th of 184 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.26 | 67.19 | 5.93 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 57.28 | 68.52 | 11.25 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Armenia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 69.61 against 67.92 in Armenia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Armenia and South Africa?
- 1.69, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and South Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Armenia and South Africa rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Armenia ranks 141st and South Africa ranks 139th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.