Armenia vs Lesotho: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Armenia
67.92
in 2014
Lesotho
70.23
in 2014
Armenia rank
138th
Lesotho rank
135th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Armenia
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 70.23 against 67.92 in Armenia, a difference of 2.31.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lesotho ahead.
Armenia ranks 138th and Lesotho ranks 135th of 181 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.26 | 68.85 | 7.59 | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 57.28 | 71.3 | 14.02 | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Armenia or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 70.23 against 67.92 in Armenia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Armenia and Lesotho?
- 2.31, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Lesotho?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Armenia and Lesotho rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Armenia ranks 138th and Lesotho ranks 135th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.