Armenia vs Belarus: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Armenia
67.92
in 2014
Belarus
66.32
in 2014
Armenia rank
138th
Belarus rank
141st

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Armenia
  • Belarus
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 67.92 against 66.32 in Belarus, a difference of 1.6.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 138th and Belarus ranks 141st of 181 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Belarus Difference Ahead
2000s 61.26 0 61.26 Armenia
2010s 57.28 29.5 27.77 Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Armenia or Belarus?
Armenia, at 67.92 against 66.32 in Belarus as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Armenia and Belarus?
1.6, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Belarus?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Armenia and Belarus rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Armenia ranks 138th and Belarus ranks 141st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.