Argentina vs St. Lucia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Argentina
65.35
in 2014
St. Lucia
66.06
in 2014
Argentina rank
148th
St. Lucia rank
147th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Argentina
- St. Lucia
How they compare
St. Lucia currently reports 66.06 against 65.35 in Argentina, a difference of 0.71.
Across all 10 years both countries report, St. Lucia has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 148th and St. Lucia ranks 147th of 183 countries.
St. Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | St. Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.23 | 57.29 | 43.06 | St. Lucia |
| 2010s | 54.62 | 63.02 | 8.4 | St. Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Argentina or St. Lucia?
- St. Lucia, at 66.06 against 65.35 in Argentina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Argentina and St. Lucia?
- 0.71, with St. Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and St. Lucia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Argentina and St. Lucia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Argentina ranks 148th and St. Lucia ranks 147th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.