Argentina vs Paraguay: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Argentina
65.35
in 2014
Paraguay
66.14
in 2014
Argentina rank
148th
Paraguay rank
145th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Argentina
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 66.14 against 65.35 in Argentina, a difference of 0.79.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 148th and Paraguay ranks 145th of 183 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.23 | 66.24 | 52.01 | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 54.62 | 68.87 | 14.25 | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Argentina or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 66.14 against 65.35 in Argentina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Argentina and Paraguay?
- 0.79, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Paraguay?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Argentina and Paraguay rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Argentina ranks 148th and Paraguay ranks 145th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.