Angola vs Mongolia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Angola
58.15
in 2014
Mongolia
54.16
in 2014
Angola rank
156th
Mongolia rank
158th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Angola
- Mongolia
How they compare
Angola currently reports 58.15 against 54.16 in Mongolia, a difference of 3.99.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 156th and Mongolia ranks 158th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.13 | 14.13 | 6 | Angola |
| 2010s | 46 | 46.41 | 0.4011 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Angola or Mongolia?
- Angola, at 58.15 against 54.16 in Mongolia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Angola and Mongolia?
- 3.99, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Mongolia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Angola and Mongolia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Angola ranks 156th and Mongolia ranks 158th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.