How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Chinese Taipei?

10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Albania vs Chinese Taipei: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)

Albania

93.58

in 2014

Chinese Taipei

93.76

in 2014

Albania rank

22nd

Chinese Taipei rank

19th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time

Albania
Chinese Taipei

How they compare

Chinese Taipei currently reports 93.76 against 93.58 in Albania, a difference of 0.18.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chinese Taipei ahead.

Albania ranks 22nd and Chinese Taipei ranks 19th of 183 countries.

Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Albania	Chinese Taipei	Difference	Ahead
2000s	90.28	93.92	3.64	Chinese Taipei
2010s	93.31	93.8	0.4888	Chinese Taipei

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Albania or Chinese Taipei?: Chinese Taipei, at 93.76 against 93.58 in Albania as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Albania and Chinese Taipei?: 0.18, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Chinese Taipei?: 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Albania and Chinese Taipei rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?: Albania ranks 22nd and Chinese Taipei ranks 19th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Albania vs Chinese Taipei: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15). Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-db06-15-methodology-score/albania/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-db06-15-methodology-score/albania/taiwan/">Albania vs Chinese Taipei: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.