Albania vs Denmark: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Albania
93.58
in 2014
Denmark
93.31
in 2014
Albania rank
22nd
Denmark rank
24th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Albania
- Denmark
How they compare
Albania currently reports 93.58 against 93.31 in Denmark, a difference of 0.27.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Denmark ahead.
Albania ranks 22nd and Denmark ranks 24th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 1 and Denmark in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.28 | 92.94 | 2.66 | Denmark |
| 2010s | 93.31 | 92.82 | 0.4906 | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Albania or Denmark?
- Albania, at 93.58 against 93.31 in Denmark as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Albania and Denmark?
- 0.27, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Denmark?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Albania and Denmark rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Albania ranks 22nd and Denmark ranks 24th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.