Afghanistan vs Zambia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Afghanistan
5.68
in 2014
Zambia
0
in 2014
Afghanistan rank
175th
Zambia rank
176th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Afghanistan
- Zambia
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 5.68 against 0 in Zambia, a difference of 5.68.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 175th and Zambia ranks 176th of 183 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.33 | 4.01 | 35.32 | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 16.6 | 0 | 16.6 | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Afghanistan or Zambia?
- Afghanistan, at 5.68 against 0 in Zambia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Afghanistan and Zambia?
- 5.68, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Zambia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Afghanistan and Zambia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Afghanistan ranks 175th and Zambia ranks 176th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.