Afghanistan vs Kyrgyzstan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Afghanistan
5.68
in 2014
Kyrgyzstan
0
in 2014
Afghanistan rank
176th
Kyrgyzstan rank
177th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Afghanistan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 5.68 against 0 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 5.68.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 176th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 177th of 184 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.33 | 6.24 | 33.08 | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 16.6 | 13.83 | 2.77 | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Afghanistan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Afghanistan, at 5.68 against 0 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Afghanistan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5.68, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Afghanistan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Afghanistan ranks 176th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 177th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.